Causal factors
Question:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – <snip okay why not try searching for what dyslexia is? try this link. http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&q=what+is+dyslexia&spell=1 is a quick google search, should cover most bases. i really think before useing words such as "cureable" you really should read up on the subject, to be frank in the words of the geeks RTFM. As a geek I fell that I have to point out that it would be STFW in this instance. Of course, if you don’t know what that meen you will just have to STFW
LOL yes indeed, i hadn’t attually heard that one or at least not rembered it i find abrevations hard to rember, though pardoxicly i use IRC which some tends to have quite a lot, of abervations. such is life i guess. Roger
Response:
[ If "bottom posting" is the official norm, then why, when I click on "Reply Group", does the panel open with a line-space at top of page, and cursor in top-left position? ]
It’s easier to tell exactly what you’re replying to with bottom posting. A preference for bottom or top posting varies from group to group, although currently bottom posting is in vogue. I think it was the other way around in the past though. I don’t know why you’re being lectured though. I know some of the people posting here have enough problems just putting the words down, and I don’t see any reason to try to impose certain rules to make it more difficult for them. The quoted definition (below) is characterised by vagueness and generality. "Dyslexia is BEST described as a COMBINATION of….etc" which adds little to meaning. However, taking the word etymologically: "dys-" means the reverse of easy (ie hard); and "-lexia" ie. "phrase, word" – from "speak".
Of course, like many words, the whole is more than the sum of all parts. I assume we mean more the written, than spoken, word. Do dyslexics have real trouble with speech, or mostly with reading and writing?
No. There is no evidence that dyslexia effects speech. If they don’t jumble words in speech, then why so when reading a page of text – unless never taught to go from top left to bottom right, or, if taught it, are incapable of following such rule?
Because their brains process that information differently than non-dyslexic brains do. I’d allege that a "consistent" dyslexic would have to have difficulties in both areas – if not, why not?
Because that isn’t how the brain works. Going back to the historical information on word blindness I gave you, in one instance there was a patient who was unable to read after experiencing a head trauma. But this same person was still able to write. Does a dyslexic have a truly malfunctioning brain, or merely a lazy one?
Since I’m able to read Shakespeare’s first folio in its original raw form with non-standard spellings and letter substitutions, and I’m able to read originals by Milton and Chaucer just as well, and understand just about all of it, I’d say we’d have to go with malfunctioning. I don’t think that there’s any greater feat I could accomplish in the realm of reading English.
Response:
To respond to comments below – 1) Here we are starting to analyse symptoms into some kind of distinct factors, each of which might have different causes. 2) Even such a seemingly "obvious" factor in writing (or reading) from left to right (c-a-t spells "cat") may not be at all obvious – unless you are actually taught it! 3) Also, when I was at school, we did "transcription", ie copying letters, with B,b and P,p grouped, to avoid confusion which may arise with these similar lower-case script characters – to the non-discriminating eye. 4) All language consists of verbal constructs which have three aspects – concept, text, and sound – and it is important that the three be emphasised and taught if a full understanding of any word, or letter, is to be grasped. 5) I’d claim that, unless a person has an actual brain or motor physical disorder, their alleged symptom is thus psychological and should be curable. 6) There are all sorts of frauds perpetrated on the public, consciously or unconsciously, and a cynic might suspect that "dyslexia" is one of them. Bad teaching methods can be fertile ground for "remedial teaching, psychologists, thesis experts, and even disadvantaged students" all of whom can profit by it. 7) Does dyslexia occur in foreign nations, or is it mainly or only a mental disorder of English-speaking countries?
It is claimed that some English-speaking people, who are otherwise dyslexic, can better learn a foreign language. Why is this so? Is a different teaching method the reason?
– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Alright. I may be confusing dyslexia with illiteracy, but a definition would help at this stage: "Dyslexia is….." ? It’s a learning disability that effects a person’s ability to read (dyslexic symptoms), ability to write (dysgraphic symptoms), sense of left and right, ability to work with ordered lists (this might be disputed), short term memory (definitely disputed), and in a some instances difficulties with simple mathematics (discalcu symptoms). The actual symptoms and their severity differ from person to person. It’s important to note that the actual problems are caused by the brain’s inability to properly process information. For instance, words can get jumbled on the page. When a dyslexic reads, the letters of a word can appear in a different order to them than what it on the page. You can see how this can create problems with reading.
Response:
Alright. I may be confusing dyslexia with illiteracy, but a definition would help at this stage: "Dyslexia is….." ?
It’s a learning disability that effects a person’s ability to read (dyslexic symptoms), ability to write (dysgraphic symptoms), sense of left and right, ability to work with ordered lists (this might be disputed), short term memory (definitely disputed), and in a some instances difficulties with simple mathematics (discalcu symptoms). The actual symptoms and their severity differ from person to person. It’s important to note that the actual problems are caused by the brain’s inability to properly process information. For instance, words can get jumbled on the page. When a dyslexic reads, the letters of a word can appear in a different order to them than what it on the page. You can see how this can create problems with reading.
Response:
OK. Look at it from the opposite angle – what are the symptoms of dyslexia, graded according to severity: (1) inability to read, at all; (2) difficulty with reading, but can read somewhat; (3) some difficulty with letters, or words, in some cases. Once these are detailed, then tackling the cause(s) gets more specific and possibly curable.
– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – If Dyslexia is "a severe problem with learning how to read", then this could be a result of – yes that is close to the latic definision ( word blindness) and the sterotype yes, but dyslexica is more than that, in that the symtoms of dyslexica incudes more than reading, infact you can be dyslexic even if your reading comprehenchion is fine… (1) The method of teaching; (2) The teacher; (3) The student: (a) psychological, or (b) physiological. It seems necessary to analyse each of these possibilities and clearly distinguish between them. If most children in a school have no trouble learning how to read, then it would seem that neither the teaching method, nor the teachers, nor the children, is at fault. But if there is a residual number of children who have great difficulty, then some psychological or physical/congenital abnormality would appear to be present. Only in such cases would the label "dyslexic" seem warranted. What is the cause(s), and how can it be remedied? A study into the background of each such child would help in finding possible common factors, including socio-economic, family structure and habits, hereditary. applying satstics to individual classes in a primary school is way too small a number for satstics to be useful, as a tool, for better or for worse there are tests for dyslexica which hopefully pick up the dyslexic child, though of course a child has to noticed, not nessarly a easy task given that children often devop at very differnat speeds. remedied well the dyslexic needs a training in their weaknesses so that they can make up some of the short fall, but no matter how much training they are still dyslexic and thus have problems in areas. ie a cure there isn’t but it can be combated. Roger
Response:
Perhaps the rise of literacy is to blame, for in ancient Egypt twas only the scribes could read, old Rameses hadn’t a clue what them heiroglyphs extolling his virtues meant, they could have been calling him a fat bald A* hole for all he knew. Different brains have been around as long as there have been humans, but dyslexia only came into being when its time had come. Larry
– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – If Dyslexia is "a severe problem with learning how to read", then this could be a result of – (1) The method of teaching; (2) The teacher; (3) The student: (a) psychological, or (b) physiological. It seems necessary to analyse each of these possibilities and clearly distinguish between them. If most children in a school have no trouble learning how to read, then it would seem that neither the teaching method, nor the teachers, nor the children, is at fault. But if there is a residual number of children who have great difficulty, then some psychological or physical/congenital abnormality would appear to be present. Only in such cases would the label "dyslexic" seem warranted. What is the cause(s), and how can it be remedied? A study into the background of each such child would help in finding possible common factors, including socio-economic, family structure and habits, hereditary.
Response:
Alright. I may be confusing dyslexia with illiteracy, but a definition would help at this stage: "Dyslexia is….." ?
– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – OK. Look at it from the opposite angle – what are the symptoms of dyslexia, graded according to severity: (1) inability to read, at all; (2) difficulty with reading, but can read somewhat; (3) some difficulty with letters, or words, in some cases. Once these are detailed, then tackling the cause(s) gets more specific and possibly curable. Dyslexia is not (remember the not, very important because it seems to be what you’re missing) defined by an inability to read. You’ve confused a symptom with the underlying problem. Some dyslexics can’t read too well. Others can read just fine. Not being able to read is illiteracy, not dyslexia. The fact that most of this NG is dyslexic proves that reading is possible. If a dyslexic is able to read, then they’ve been able to compensate for the symptoms that made reading difficult in the first place, they have not been cured and the problems still exist. It’s clear that you’ve come up with some theories on how dyslexia should be dealt with without understanding dyslexia in the slightest.
Response:
[ If "bottom posting" is the official norm, then why, when I click on "Reply Group", does the panel open with a line-space at top of page, and cursor in top-left position? ] The quoted definition (below) is characterised by vagueness and generality. "Dyslexia is BEST described as a COMBINATION of….etc" which adds little to meaning. However, taking the word etymologically: "dys-" means the reverse of easy (ie hard); and "-lexia" ie. "phrase, word" – from "speak". I assume we mean more the written, than spoken, word. Do dyslexics have real trouble with speech, or mostly with reading and writing? If they don’t jumble words in speech, then why so when reading a page of text – unless never taught to go from top left to bottom right, or, if taught it, are incapable of following such rule? I’d allege that a "consistent" dyslexic would have to have difficulties in both areas – if not, why not? Does a dyslexic have a truly malfunctioning brain, or merely a lazy one?
– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Alright. I may be confusing dyslexia with illiteracy, but a definition would help at this stage: "Dyslexia is….." ? <snip Would you please post responses under the text you are responding to, like I am? This is called bottom posting and was the convention on Usenet from its inception. As to your question, a 30 search found this: http://www.bda-dyslexia.org.uk/main/information/extras/x02stats.asp To quote from the site: 1. BDA definition of dyslexia. "Dyslexia is best described as a combination of abilities and difficulties that affect the learning process in one or more of reading, spelling, writing. Accompanying weaknesses may be identified in areas of speed of processing, short-term memory, sequencing and organisation, auditory and/or visual perception, spoken language and motor skills. It is particularly related to mastering and using written language, which may include alphabetic, numeric and musical notation. Some dyslexics have outstanding creative skills. Others have strong oral skills. Some have no outstanding talents. They all have strengths. Dyslexia can occur despite normal intellectual ability and teaching. It is independent of socio-economic or language background."(The Dyslexia Handbook 2002, p67.) You will also find links to lots of other useful sites for research on that page. — Flash Gordon Sometimes I think shooting would be far too good for some people. Although my email address says spam, it is real and I read it.
Response:
OK. Look at it from the opposite angle – what are the symptoms of dyslexia, graded according to severity: (1) inability to read, at all; (2) difficulty with reading, but can read somewhat; (3) some difficulty with letters, or words, in some cases. Once these are detailed, then tackling the cause(s) gets more specific and possibly curable.
snips due to top posting…. okay why not try searching for what dyslexia is? try this link. http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&q=what+is+dyslexia&spell=1 is a quick google search, should cover most bases. i really think before useing words such as "cureable" you really should read up on the subject, to be frank in the words of the geeks RTFM. Roger
Response:
<snip okay why not try searching for what dyslexia is? try this link. http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&q=what+is+dyslexia&spell=1 is a quick google search, should cover most bases. i really think before useing words such as "cureable" you really should read up on the subject, to be frank in the words of the geeks RTFM.
As a geek I fell that I have to point out that it would be STFW in this instance. Of course, if you don’t know what that meen you will just have to STFW
— Flash Gordon Sometimes I think shooting would be far too good for some people. Although my email address says spam, it is real and I read it.
Response:
If Dyslexia is "a severe problem with learning how to read", then this could be a result of – (1) The method of teaching; (2) The teacher; (3) The student: (a) psychological, or (b) physiological. It seems necessary to analyse each of these possibilities and clearly distinguish between them. If most children in a school have no trouble learning how to read, then it would seem that neither the teaching method, nor the teachers, nor the children, is at fault. But if there is a residual number of children who have great difficulty, then some psychological or physical/congenital abnormality would appear to be present. Only in such cases would the label "dyslexic" seem warranted. What is the cause(s), and how can it be remedied? A study into the background of each such child would help in finding possible common factors, including socio-economic, family structure and habits, hereditary.
Response:
Definatly not what Ted Rosenburg says and thinks it is
No if it were solely reading it would not have any real existance in non literate societies, yet whatever gives rise to it, must always have been there, and only became relevant in a more demanding society. ergo it is social. Larry
– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Alright. I may be confusing dyslexia with illiteracy, but a definition would help at this stage: "Dyslexia is….." ? OK. Look at it from the opposite angle – what are the symptoms of dyslexia, graded according to severity: (1) inability to read, at all; (2) difficulty with reading, but can read somewhat; (3) some difficulty with letters, or words, in some cases. Once these are detailed, then tackling the cause(s) gets more specific and possibly curable. Dyslexia is not (remember the not, very important because it seems to be what you’re missing) defined by an inability to read. You’ve confused a symptom with the underlying problem. Some dyslexics can’t read too well. Others can read just fine. Not being able to read is illiteracy, not dyslexia. The fact that most of this NG is dyslexic proves that reading is possible. If a dyslexic is able to read, then they’ve been able to compensate for the symptoms that made reading difficult in the first place, they have not been cured and the problems still exist. It’s clear that you’ve come up with some theories on how dyslexia should be dealt with without understanding dyslexia in the slightest.
Response:
To respond to comments below – 1) Here we are starting to analyse symptoms into some kind of distinct factors, each of which might have different causes.
But the symptoms themselves are largely related. Dyslexics generally suffer from several in variable degrees. Take for instance tying your shoes. We can agree that tying your shoes is about as far removed from reading as one can get, and the method, or lack of literacy, that were used to teach you reading have nothing to do with shoe tying. Yet a lot of dyslexic children have difficulties learning to tie their shoes. It’s one of the warning signs of dyslexia. 2) Even such a seemingly "obvious" factor in writing (or reading) from left to right (c-a-t spells "cat") may not be at all obvious – unless you are actually taught it!
The problem is when a dyslexic looks at a word, it may not appear the same way a non-dyslexic would see it. 3) Also, when I was at school, we did "transcription", ie copying letters, with B,b and P,p grouped, to avoid confusion which may arise with these similar lower-case script characters – to the non-discriminating eye.
Dyslexia is not caused by a problem with distinguishing letters. I can vouch for that much. 5) I’d claim that, unless a person has an actual brain or motor physical disorder, their alleged symptom is thus psychological and should be curable. 6) There are all sorts of frauds perpetrated on the public, consciously or unconsciously, and a cynic might suspect that "dyslexia" is one of them. Bad teaching methods can be fertile ground for "remedial teaching, psychologists, thesis experts, and even disadvantaged students" all of whom can profit by it.
The problem with this theory is there are a lot of people who would like to have dyslexia dissappear. What is probably the most common problem in this group is parents who are trying to get their children properly diagnosed by school district standards. The schools don’t want to have to pay out extra money to teach dyslexics properly, and they’re notorious for misdiagnosing students. There are, however, ways to make money off dyslexia. They usually involve your word, cure. There are enough parents of dyslexic children out there who would be willing to shell out a lot of money if they are led to believe someone may be offering a potential cure for their children. These cures are pretty much bogus without any scientific backing, and improvements that do happen are usually due to following tried and true methods in addition to the supposed cure. 7) Does dyslexia occur in foreign nations, or is it mainly or only a mental disorder of English-speaking countries?
I’d be particularly interested in any information about dyslexia and forgien languages. I’m curious what the effect would be with languages that have different alphabets (Russian and Japanese for instance) or whole word letters (like Mandrin).
It is claimed that some English-speaking people, who are otherwise dyslexic, can better learn a foreign language. Why is this so? Is a different teaching method the reason?
I’ve never heard of this, and find it very difficult to learn a foreign language.
Response:
Alright. I may be confusing dyslexia with illiteracy, but a definition would help at this stage: "Dyslexia is….." ?
<snip Would you please post responses under the text you are responding to, like I am? This is called bottom posting and was the convention on Usenet from its inception. As to your question, a 30 search found this: http://www.bda-dyslexia.org.uk/main/information/extras/x02stats.asp To quote from the site: 1. BDA definition of dyslexia. "Dyslexia is best described as a combination of abilities and difficulties that affect the learning process in one or more of reading, spelling, writing. Accompanying weaknesses may be identified in areas of speed of processing, short-term memory, sequencing and organisation, auditory and/or visual perception, spoken language and motor skills. It is particularly related to mastering and using written language, which may include alphabetic, numeric and musical notation. Some dyslexics have outstanding creative skills. Others have strong oral skills. Some have no outstanding talents. They all have strengths. Dyslexia can occur despite normal intellectual ability and teaching. It is independent of socio-economic or language background."(The Dyslexia Handbook 2002, p67.)
You will also find links to lots of other useful sites for research on that page. — Flash Gordon Sometimes I think shooting would be far too good for some people. Although my email address says spam, it is real and I read it.
Response:
How were you taught English at school – by Phonics, or the Whole Word Method? Someone taught by the latter, "guessing", method could take a life-time of undoing to correct. I’m prepared to concede that a malady called ‘dyslexia’ does exist – but only when all possible causes of inability to read and write have been examined; even then it still has to be explained in terms of physical or psychological abnormality of some kind.
– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – [ If "bottom posting" is the official norm, then why, when I click on "Reply Group", does the panel open with a line-space at top of page, and cursor in top-left position? ] Because Microsoft tend to ignore standards. This site looks like it has a good discussion on the topic, including quoting the relevant RFC: http://www.caliburn.nl/topposting.html A: Because it is harder to read Q: Why is top posting wrong? Or to put it another way, I have to keep scrolling up and down to see what the fsck is going on in your posts. BTW, I don’t complain about dyslexics top posting because this group is to support dyslexics, and complaining does not help. The quoted definition (below) is characterised by vagueness and generality. "Dyslexia is BEST described as a COMBINATION of….etc" which adds little to meaning. Well, I suggest you tell the British Dyslexia Association (A major charity supporting Dyslexics in the UK) that they are not helpful. Of course, you could have checked out the links they provide (which I suggested might be helpful) and found on http://www.interdys.org/servlet/compose?section_id=5&page_id=95 a definition that might be more to your liking. I quote: | Dyslexia is a specific learning disability that is neurological in | origin. It is characterized by difficulties with accurate and / or ^^^^^^ | fluent word recognition and by poor spelling and decoding abilities. | These difficulties typically result from a deficit in the | phonological component of language that is often unexpected in | relation to other cognitive abilities and the provision of effective | classroom instruction. Secondary consequences may include problems in | reading comprehension and reduced reading experience that can impede | growth of vocabulary and background knowledge However, taking the word etymologically: "dys-" means the reverse of easy (ie hard); and "-lexia" ie. "phrase, word" – from "speak". I assume we mean more the written, than spoken, word. Yes, it generally affects reading and writing rather than spoken language. Do dyslexics have real trouble with speech, or mostly with reading and writing? If they don’t jumble words in speech, then why so when reading a page of text – unless never taught to go from top left to bottom right, or, if taught it, are incapable of following such rule? Well, in extreme cases there is not much understanding of the difference between left and write. It was certainly a concept which I had great difficulty with, although in my case learning to play a musical instrument helped. I’d allege that a "consistent" dyslexic would have to have difficulties in both areas – if not, why not? Because processing written language uses different portions of the brain. Even today (at 37) I have to internally convert the written word in to the spoken word and "listen" to myself internally vocalising in order to read. Something I am told that "normal" people do not have to do. Also, to write or type English I have to internally say what I am writing/typing. Does a dyslexic have a truly malfunctioning brain, or merely a lazy one? Well, since a lot of dyslexics have worked very hard to learn to read/write (in my case it is bad enough that my mind has completely blanked out that part of my life, but my mum tells me that it frequently led to tears of frustration) it is hard to think that it could be laziness. <snip I also suggest you do some basic research. There is evidence (brain scans) of dyslexics using different parts of the brain for processing the written word to "normal" people. — Flash Gordon Sometimes I think shooting would be far too good for some people. Although my email address says spam, it is real and I read it.
Response:
To respond to comments below – 1) Here we are starting to analyse symptoms into some kind of distinct factors, each of which might have different causes.
Not we, you are 2) Even such a seemingly "obvious" factor in writing (or reading) from left to right (c-a-t spells "cat") may not be at all obvious – unless you are actually taught it!
You forget the next step, converting the written word cat into the concept of a cat 3) Also, when I was at school, we did "transcription", ie copying letters, with B,b and P,p grouped, to avoid confusion which may arise with these similar lower-case script characters – to the non-discriminating eye.
see my other answer to you 4) All language consists of verbal constructs which have three aspects – concept, text, and sound – and it is important that the three be emphasised and taught if a full understanding of any word, or letter, is to be grasped.
Ok, but as the word cat does not have any resemblance to a picture of a cat it can be very difficult for some people. 5) I’d claim that, unless a person has an actual brain or motor physical disorder, their alleged symptom is thus psychological and should be curable.
This disorder is not greater as that of a person who thinks that reading from bottom to top is the best way 6) There are all sorts of frauds perpetrated on the public, consciously or unconsciously, and a cynic might suspect that "dyslexia" is one of them. Bad teaching methods can be fertile ground for "remedial teaching, psychologists, thesis experts, and even disadvantaged students" all of whom can profit by it.
That’s why a good diagnostic is essential 7) Does dyslexia occur in foreign nations, or is it mainly or only a mental disorder of English-speaking countries?
Yes, it’s slightly higher in English-speaking environments because English is less consistent in sound/writing relations
It is claimed that some English-speaking people, who are otherwise dyslexic, can better learn a foreign language. Why is this so? Is a different teaching method the reason?
I doubt that very much, it would several years (say 20) to learn that second language first. — ViSiToR
Response:
If Dyslexia is "a severe problem with learning how to read", then this could be a result of –
yes that is close to the latic definision ( word blindness) and the sterotype yes, but dyslexica is more than that, in that the symtoms of dyslexica incudes more than reading, infact you can be dyslexic even if your reading comprehenchion is fine… (1) The method of teaching; (2) The teacher; (3) The student: (a) psychological, or (b) physiological. It seems necessary to analyse each of these possibilities and clearly distinguish between them. If most children in a school have no trouble learning how to read, then it would seem that neither the teaching method, nor the teachers, nor the children, is at fault. But if there is a residual number of children who have great difficulty, then some psychological or physical/congenital abnormality would appear to be present. Only in such cases would the label "dyslexic" seem warranted. What is the cause(s), and how can it be remedied? A study into the background of each such child would help in finding possible common factors, including socio-economic, family structure and habits, hereditary.
applying satstics to individual classes in a primary school is way too small a number for satstics to be useful, as a tool, for better or for worse there are tests for dyslexica which hopefully pick up the dyslexic child, though of course a child has to noticed, not nessarly a easy task given that children often devop at very differnat speeds. remedied well the dyslexic needs a training in their weaknesses so that they can make up some of the short fall, but no matter how much training they are still dyslexic and thus have problems in areas. ie a cure there isn’t but it can be combated. Roger
Response:
Oh yes and some of us are dyscalculic, not that some people recognise that with there narrow focus on reading as if that is the be all and end all.. Larry
– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – OK. Look at it from the opposite angle – what are the symptoms of dyslexia, graded according to severity: (1) inability to read, at all; (2) difficulty with reading, but can read somewhat; (3) some difficulty with letters, or words, in some cases. Once these are detailed, then tackling the cause(s) gets more specific and possibly curable.
Response:
How were you taught English at school – by Phonics, or the Whole Word Method? Someone taught by the latter, "guessing", method could take a life-time of undoing to correct. I’m prepared to concede that a malady called ‘dyslexia’ does exist – but only when all possible causes of inability to read and write have been examined; even then it still has to be explained in terms of physical or psychological abnormality of some kind.
Once again, This has all been studied, the answers are there, go and read in the right places. But first: Dyslexia is not a "malady", there is no physical or psychological "abnormality" and it has nothing to do with learning methods. Positively speaking it has to do with the extreme efforts a dyslectic person has to make in learning to read and write. It is a very selective disturbance in automating the skills that are needed for such. — ViSiToR
Response:
[ If "bottom posting" is the official norm, then why, when I click on "Reply Group", does the panel open with a line-space at top of page, and cursor in top-left position? ]
Because Microsoft tend to ignore standards. This site looks like it has a good discussion on the topic, including quoting the relevant RFC: http://www.caliburn.nl/topposting.html A: Because it is harder to read Q: Why is top posting wrong? Or to put it another way, I have to keep scrolling up and down to see what the fsck is going on in your posts. BTW, I don’t complain about dyslexics top posting because this group is to support dyslexics, and complaining does not help. The quoted definition (below) is characterised by vagueness and generality. "Dyslexia is BEST described as a COMBINATION of….etc" which adds little to meaning.
Well, I suggest you tell the British Dyslexia Association (A major charity supporting Dyslexics in the UK) that they are not helpful. Of course, you could have checked out the links they provide (which I suggested might be helpful) and found on http://www.interdys.org/servlet/compose?section_id=5&page_id=95 a definition that might be more to your liking. I quote: | Dyslexia is a specific learning disability that is neurological in | origin. It is characterized by difficulties with accurate and / or ^^^^^^ | fluent word recognition and by poor spelling and decoding abilities. | These difficulties typically result from a deficit in the | phonological component of language that is often unexpected in | relation to other cognitive abilities and the provision of effective | classroom instruction. Secondary consequences may include problems in | reading comprehension and reduced reading experience that can impede | growth of vocabulary and background knowledge However, taking the word etymologically: "dys-" means the reverse of easy (ie hard); and "-lexia" ie. "phrase, word" – from "speak". I assume we mean more the written, than spoken, word.
Yes, it generally affects reading and writing rather than spoken language. Do dyslexics have real trouble with speech, or mostly with reading and writing? If they don’t jumble words in speech, then why so when reading a page of text – unless never taught to go from top left to bottom right, or, if taught it, are incapable of following such rule?
Well, in extreme cases there is not much understanding of the difference between left and write. It was certainly a concept which I had great difficulty with, although in my case learning to play a musical instrument helped. I’d allege that a "consistent" dyslexic would have to have difficulties in both areas – if not, why not?
Because processing written language uses different portions of the brain. Even today (at 37) I have to internally convert the written word in to the spoken word and "listen" to myself internally vocalising in order to read. Something I am told that "normal" people do not have to do. Also, to write or type English I have to internally say what I am writing/typing. Does a dyslexic have a truly malfunctioning brain, or merely a lazy one?
Well, since a lot of dyslexics have worked very hard to learn to read/write (in my case it is bad enough that my mind has completely blanked out that part of my life, but my mum tells me that it frequently led to tears of frustration) it is hard to think that it could be laziness. <snip I also suggest you do some basic research. There is evidence (brain scans) of dyslexics using different parts of the brain for processing the written word to "normal" people. — Flash Gordon Sometimes I think shooting would be far too good for some people. Although my email address says spam, it is real and I read it.
Response:
I even speak in jumbled letters, lets here it for the rev Spooner shall we. As for language, you herd on the motor thery on language yet ? or cognitive linguistics, bin you a whorfian or no ? Larry
– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – To respond to comments below – 1) Here we are starting to analyse symptoms into some kind of distinct factors, each of which might have different causes. 2) Even such a seemingly "obvious" factor in writing (or reading) from left to right (c-a-t spells "cat") may not be at all obvious – unless you are actually taught it! 3) Also, when I was at school, we did "transcription", ie copying letters, with B,b and P,p grouped, to avoid confusion which may arise with these similar lower-case script characters – to the non-discriminating eye. 4) All language consists of verbal constructs which have three aspects – concept, text, and sound – and it is important that the three be emphasised and taught if a full understanding of any word, or letter, is to be grasped. 5) I’d claim that, unless a person has an actual brain or motor physical disorder, their alleged symptom is thus psychological and should be curable. 6) There are all sorts of frauds perpetrated on the public, consciously or unconsciously, and a cynic might suspect that "dyslexia" is one of them. Bad teaching methods can be fertile ground for "remedial teaching, psychologists, thesis experts, and even disadvantaged students" all of whom can profit by it. 7) Does dyslexia occur in foreign nations, or is it mainly or only a mental disorder of English-speaking countries?
It is claimed that some English-speaking people, who are otherwise dyslexic, can better learn a foreign language. Why is this so? Is a different teaching method the reason?
Response:
Well my STM is F*cked Larry
– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Alright. I may be confusing dyslexia with illiteracy, but a definition would help at this stage: "Dyslexia is….." ? It’s a learning disability that effects a person’s ability to read (dyslexic symptoms), ability to write (dysgraphic symptoms), sense of left and right, ability to work with ordered lists (this might be disputed), short term memory (definitely disputed), and in a some instances difficulties with simple mathematics (discalcu symptoms). The actual symptoms and their severity differ from person to person. It’s important to note that the actual problems are caused by the brain’s inability to properly process information. For instance, words can get jumbled on the page. When a dyslexic reads, the letters of a word can appear in a different order to them than what it on the page. You can see how this can create problems with reading.
Response:
Top Dog – or Lowly Cur? There’s long sight, and there’s myopia, But I suffer – dys-end-top-ia; Which means that I write topsy-turvy, And brands me as a knave, quite scurvy; Who won’t, or can’t, obey the rules, When I cast to swine, my mental pearls. ‘Cos posting requires an addendum, Not prefaced, but bottom-ending. Yet I prefer: prime post, with quotes, And past comments, as footnotes. To those demanding it end-after’d; All I say is – go, get shafted. DYSLEXIA, a difficulty in reading that is disproportionate relative to other intellectual abilities. It is considered to be a congenital disability in organizing, which affects short-term memory, hand skills, and perception, leading to difficulties with literary skills. It is typified by erratic spelling, often accompanied by letter reversals or word reversals. This indicates that one of the difficulties lies in imposing a consistent spatial orientation on written material. Other possible causes may lie in relating what words look like to how they sound. Recent research suggests that dyslexia is linked to a neurological abnormality that affects vision. There are about 2.5 million dyslexics in the UK. – "Oxford Interactive Encyclopedia" DYSDOCTRINA – a misconception relating to teaching of the English language, whereby blame is shifted from the teaching method onto the child; result is: dyslexia.
– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – [ If "bottom posting" is the official norm, then why, when I click on "Reply Group", does the panel open with a line-space at top of page, and cursor in top-left position? ]
Response:
<Top-posting repaired – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Alright. I may be confusing dyslexia with illiteracy, but a definition would help at this stage: "Dyslexia is….." ? <snip Would you please post responses under the text you are responding to, like I am? This is called bottom posting and was the convention on Usenet from its inception. As to your question, a 30 search found this: http://www.bda-dyslexia.org.uk/main/information/extras/x02stats.asp To quote from the site: 1. BDA definition of dyslexia. "Dyslexia is best described as a combination of abilities and difficulties that affect the learning process in one or more of reading, spelling, writing. Accompanying weaknesses may be identified in areas of speed of processing, short-term memory, sequencing and organisation, auditory and/or visual perception, spoken language and motor skills. It is particularly related to mastering and using written language, which may include alphabetic, numeric and musical notation. Some dyslexics have outstanding creative skills. Others have strong oral skills. Some have no outstanding talents. They all have strengths. Dyslexia can occur despite normal intellectual ability and teaching. It is independent of socio-economic or language background."(The Dyslexia Handbook 2002, p67.) You will also find links to lots of other useful sites for research on that page. — Flash Gordon Sometimes I think shooting would be far too good for some people. Although my email address says spam, it is real and I read it. [ If "bottom posting" is the official norm, then why, when I click on "Reply Group", does the panel open with a line-space at top of page, and cursor in top-left position? ]
Choose the appropriate answer(s). a. You are not using a proper newsreader. b. You are not willing to comply to conventions. c. You are a troll. d. You read from bottom to top, most people don’t. The quoted definition (below) is characterised by vagueness and generality. "Dyslexia is BEST described as a COMBINATION of….etc" which adds little to meaning. However, taking the word etymologically: "dys-" means the reverse of easy (ie hard); and "-lexia" ie. "phrase, word" – from "speak". I assume we mean more the written, than spoken, word. Do dyslexics have real trouble with speech, or mostly with reading and writing? If they don’t jumble words in speech, then why so when reading a page of text – unless never taught to go from top left to bottom right, or, if taught it, are incapable of following such rule? I’d allege that a "consistent" dyslexic would have to have difficulties in both areas – if not, why not?
This is a dyslexia support-group, not a group where you can learn all about dyslexia. These questions are off-topic here. Does a dyslexic have a truly malfunctioning brain, or merely a lazy one?
They have a different, much better brain. — ViSiToR
Response:
OK. Look at it from the opposite angle – what are the symptoms of dyslexia, graded according to severity: (1) inability to read, at all; (2) difficulty with reading, but can read somewhat; (3) some difficulty with letters, or words, in some cases. Once these are detailed, then tackling the cause(s) gets more specific and possibly curable.
Dyslexia is not (remember the not, very important because it seems to be what you’re missing) defined by an inability to read. You’ve confused a symptom with the underlying problem. Some dyslexics can’t read too well. Others can read just fine. Not being able to read is illiteracy, not dyslexia. The fact that most of this NG is dyslexic proves that reading is possible. If a dyslexic is able to read, then they’ve been able to compensate for the symptoms that made reading difficult in the first place, they have not been cured and the problems still exist. It’s clear that you’ve come up with some theories on how dyslexia should be dealt with without understanding dyslexia in the slightest.
Categories: